Fuel Savings Calculator

How It Works
United States Canada

Please select one:

Fleet Information

On which wheel positions are you evaluating use of more fuel-efficient tires?
Number of tractors in fleet or sub-fleet being analyzed  help
Axle configuration
Average annual miles per vehicle  help
Fleet's current average fuel efficiency (mpg)  help
Average cost-per-gallon for fuel

Rolling Resistance Comparison

  Current Tire Proposed Goodyear Tire
Steer tire options you wish to compare help
Drive tire options you wish to compare help
Trail tire options you wish to compare help

*Potential fuel savings are shown for comparison only and are estimated based on ISO 28580 truck tire rolling resistance coefficient data. Actual results may vary depending on tire size, load, driving and road conditions, vehicle configuration, maintenance and operating conditions. For more information, contact your local Goodyear Commercial Truck Tire Sales Representative.

Potential Cost Savings

Export Table:

Fleet Information

Current Tire

Proposed Goodyear Tire

Number of tractors in fleet or subfleet:

Fleet's current average fuel efficiency:

Average annual miles per vehicle:

Average cost-per-gallon for fuel:

Current Proposed Difference
Fleets average fuel efficiency (mpg)
Fleet's total annual fuel requirements (gallons)
Total potential annual fuel costs

To keep a tractor-trailer moving at highway speeds, the trucks engine has to consume fuel to produce the horsepower required to overcome drag forces. Overcoming tire rolling resistance is not the only drag force consuming fuel. Rolling resistance is responsible for about one third of a tractor-trailer's drag forces, making it an important contributor to fuel consumption. (The largest source of drag force on a truck is aerodynamic drag. Frictional drag in the truck's drive train plays a smaller role in determining a rig's fuel consumption.)

In general, a 3% reduction in the total rolling resistance of all 18 tires on a standard tractor-trailer will provide about 1% improvement in controlled SAE Type II truck fuel economy. Breaking it down further, to achieve the same SAE Type II fuel economy savings, the truck's steer tires would require a 20% reduction in rolling resistance, while the drive and the trial position tires would only require an 8% and 6% reduction, respectively.

How does rolling resistance translate into miles-per-gallon and dollars-and-cents savings for your fleet? Enter your specific information into the below calculator to find out!